IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L. Victoria Gowri, J
A.Arul Stephenson – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. directs police to preserve specific cctv footage. (Para 3) |
To Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to preserve the CCTV footage on the occurrence dated 11.04.2026 at about 1.00 p.m., to 04.00 p.m., before the 2nd respondent Police Station and consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.04.2026 before the first respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr. S. Ramakrishnan, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
Seeking to direct the 1st respondent to preserve the CCTV footage on the occurrence dated 11.04.2026 at about 1.00 p.m., to 04.00 p.m., before the 2nd respondent Police Station and consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.04.2026 before the first respondent.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is a practicing advocate who had frequented to the second respondent police station on 11-4-2026 at about 2.00 p.m. on which date he was manhandled by the 2nd respondent police and hence he had sent a representation on 12.04.2026, seeking to preserve the CCTV footage from 1.00 p.m. to 4.00 p.m. on 11-4-2026 in the Thiruvattar police station. The same is not considered, hence the petition is filed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.