Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
B.PUGALENDHI, J
G.Joseph Jeyaseelan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu Rep.By, The Inspector of Police, Keerathurai Police Station, Madurai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks direction for timely trial conclusion. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. trial advanced, witnesses examined. (Para 3) |
| 3. court notes delay, prior order non-compliance. (Para 4) |
| 4. petition disposed with direction to conclude trial. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
The petitioner/defacto complainant in CC No.391of 2018, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.IV, Madurai has filed this petition, seeking a direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial in the above case, within a stipulated time.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner by referring to the earlier order passed by this Court in WP(MD) No. 16383 of 2018, dated 26.11.2024 submits that this Court has already issued a direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of that order. However, the trial in the above said case has not been concluded so far. Hence, he seeks a suitable direction.
3.Mr.R.Meeaksshi Sundaram, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who takes notice for the respondent submits that the witnesses LW 1 to LW 9 were already examined and the case in CC No.391 of 2018 is posted to 23.04.2026 for examination of the i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
