Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
Aniber Benin – Appellant
Versus
The Bar Council of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's enrolment application delayed post aibe (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. verification complete; delay by state bar council (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. bci to extend time due to respondent's fault (Para 6) |
The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition seeking a direction to the first respondent, Bar Council of India, to forthwith extend the time limit for the petitioner’s enrolment with the second respondent, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, notwithstanding the expiry of the prescribed six-month period from the date of publication of the All India Bar Examination results on 21.03.2025. The petitioner further seeks a direction to the second respondent to process his enrolment application (Application No. PR/2024/36764 dated 25.10.2024) in accordance with Section 24 of the Advocates Act, 1961, within a reasonable time.
2. We have heard the submissions made on either side and perused the materials available on record.
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that he completed his LL.B. degree in the year 2024 and submitted an application for enrolment with the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry on 25.10.2024. During the pendency of his application, he appeared for th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
