SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35090

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
M/s.AnanyaKrishnaa Constructions Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
V.Narayanan – Respondent
Arbitration Original Petition (Commercial Division)



Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. T.Thiageswaran for M/s.Waraon And Sai Rams
For the Respondent(s): Mr.V.Sundarraman

Court appoints sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) when parties fail to mutually agree per arbitration clause.

Headnote:Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a petition was filed to appoint a sole arbitrator for disputes arising from a Joint Development Agreement dated 06.07.2015, which contained Clause 30 mandating arbitration under the Act with venue at Chennai. The court noted execution of the agreement, invocation via notice under Section 21, and respondent's refusal to consent to the proposed arbitrator, requiring nomination of three persons. The court found the agreement provided for arbitration by a sole arbitrator. Issues framed around appointment due to failure in mutual consent under Clause 30. The court reasoned that in such circumstances, it could appoint under Section 11(6). The petition is allowed by appointing Mr.M.K.Kabir, Senior Advocate, as sole arbitrator.

Table of Content
1. agreement provides arbitration; notice invoked but consent refused. (Para 1 , 2)
2. parties agree to arbitration clause applicability. (Para 3)
3. court appoints sole arbitrator under section 11(6). (Para 4)

ORDER

Joint Development Agreement dated 06.07.2015 was executed by the petitioner and the respondent. Clause 30 thereof, which provides for dispute resolution by arbitration, is set out below:

“30.The parties herein agree to settle all disputes, misunderstandings and difference of opinion that might be arising between them whether as to the interpretation of the terms and conditions, contained herein and / or as to the determination of their respective rights, by way of referring such dispute/s to the sole arbitrator to be appointed by the Party of the Second Part with the consent of the Party of the First Part. The procedure as prescribed by the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as amended up to date shall be adopted by the sole arbitrator / umpire as the case may be. The law applicable shall be Indian law and the venue of Arbitration shall be at Chennai. The Courts in Chennai alone shall have sole and exclusive jurisdiction to try all consequential proceedings arising from the said award / arbitration proceedings.”

2. Invoking said clause upon disputes arising between the parties, the petitioner issued notice dated 12.10.2022 under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Upon receipt thereof, by reply dated 03.12.2022, the respondent refused to consent to the person proposed by the petitioner and instead called upon the petitioner to nominate three persons so as to enable the respondent to agree on the sole arbitrator.

3. Thus, parties agree that the joint development agreement provides for dispute resolution through arbitration by a sole arbitrator.

4. In the above facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed by appointing Mr.M.K.Kabir, Senior Advocate, Mobile No.9840044258, as the sole arbitrator. Learned arbitrator is requested to enter upon reference and adjudicate the dispute. The fees and expenses of arbitration shall be fixed by learned arbitrator in consultation with the parties. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top