IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
M/s. AnanyaKrishnaa Constructions Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
P V Viswanathan – Respondent
Arbitration Original Petition (Commercial Division)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arbitration clause invoked via notice; consent refused (Para 2) |
| 2. agreement valid; court appoints sole arbitrator (Para 3 , 4) |
ORDER
Joint Development Agreement dated 31.03.2016 was executed by the petitioner and the respondent. Clause 30 thereof, which provides for dispute resolution by arbitration, is set out below:
“30.The parties herein agree to settle all disputes, misunderstandings and difference of opinion that might be arising between them whether as to the interpretation of the terms and conditions, contained herein and / or as to the determination of their respective rights, by way of referring such dispute/s to the sole arbitrator to be appointed by the Party of the Second Part with the consent of the Party of the First Part. The procedure as prescribed by the IndianArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996as amended up to date shall be adopted by the sole arbitrator / umpire as the case may be. The law applicable shall be Indian law and the venue of Arbitration shall be at Chennai. The Courts in Chennai alone shall have sole and exclusive jurisdiction to try all consequential proceedings arising from the said award / arbitration proceedings.”
2. Invoking said clause upon disputes arising between the parties, the petitioner issued notice dated 12.10.2022 under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Upon receipt thereof, by reply dated 10.11.2022, the respondent refused to consent to the person proposed by the petitioner and instead called upon the petitioner to nominate three persons so as to enable the respondent to agree on the sole arbitrator.
3. Thus, parties agree that the joint development agreement provides for dispute resolution through arbitration by a sole arbitrator.
4. In the above facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed by appointing Mr.M.K.Kabir, Senior Advocate, Mobile No.9840044258, as the sole arbitrator. Learned arbitrator is requested to enter upon reference and adjudicate the dispute. The fees and expenses of arbitration shall be fixed by learned arbitrator in consultation with the parties. No costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.