IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J
M.R.Vijayabhaskar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
Criminal Original Petition|Cr.No.129/2026|Crl.MP.No.379 of 2026|Crl.MP.No.212 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of offences, anticipatory bail, and prior extensions (Para 4) |
| 2. petitioner's election duties justify delay (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. prosecution opposes due to non-compliance (Para 7) |
| 4. court sets aside dismissal, grants surrender extension (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS , to set aside the order dated 02.04.2026 made in Crl.MP.No.379 of 2026 in Crl.MP.No.212 of 2026 on the file of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Karur, and consequently extend the time for surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur and pass such further or other orders as this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. For Petitioner(s): Mr.I.Abrar Mohammed Abdullah for Mr.J.Senthil Kumaraiah For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udaya Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
The petition has been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 02.04.2026 made in Crl.MP.No.379 of 2026 in Crl.MP.No.212 of 2026 on the file of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Karur, and consequently extend the time for surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur.
2.The case of the petitioner is that he is an accused in Crime No. 129 of 2026 registered by the respondent for offences underSection 303(2) of theBNSandSection 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.
3.The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail in Crl.M.P. No. 212 of 2026.
By an order dated 12.03.2026, the learned District and Sessions Judge, Karur, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to certain conditions. Specifically, the petitioner was directed to surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Karur, within 15 days from the date of the order, failing which the bail would stand automatically cancelled. Furthermore, the petitioner was ordered to report and sign before the respondent police daily at 10:30 AM for a period of one week, and thereafter, sign before the Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Karur, at 10:30 AM for a subsequent period of one week.
4.Mr.I.Abrar Mohammed Abdullah, learned counsel representing Mr.J.Senthil Kumaraiah, learned counsel on record for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a former MLA and former Minister for Transport, currently serving as the District Secretary of the AIADMK for Karur District. He is also a contesting candidate in the Tamil Nadu Assembly Election scheduled for 23.04.2026. Due to his demanding political engagements and campaign schedule, the petitioner was unable to comply with the surrender condition within the stipulated time. Consequently, he filed Crl.M.P. No. 344 of 2026 seeking a modification of the conditions imposed in Crl.M.P. No. 212 of 2026, alongside a memo seeking a 15-day extension to surrender. By an order dated 25.03.2026, the learned District Judge was pleased to allow the same, granting one week to surrender before the Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Karur, and modifying the reporting condition to a single day before both the respondent police and the said Magistrate.
5.The petitioner’s failure to surrender within the stipulated time was neither intentional nor negligent. The deadline lapsed specifically because he was occupied with the mandatory filing of his election nomination on 30.03.2026. This was followed immediately by the Mahavir Jayanti public holiday on 31.03.2026, which was the final day of his extension. As the court was closed on the day the period expired, the petitioner was unable to comply with the directions issued in Crl.M.P. No. 344 of 2026. Consequently, the petitioner filed Crl.M.P. No. 379 of 2026 seeking a further extension. However, by an order dated 02.04.2026, the learned Judge dismissed the application on the grounds that the petitioner had failed to surrender. Aggrieved by this dismissal, the petitioner has filed the present petition to challenge the said order.
6.He further submits that the petitioner had no intention to disobey the orders
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.