Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
Rajmohan – Appellant
Versus
Kasthuri – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge trial court dismissal of additional written statement application post-impleadment. (Para 2) |
| 2. pre-trial stage permits additional defenses without prejudice to prevent multiplicity. (Para 4) |
ORDER
Challenging the impugned order dated 27.06.2024 passed in I.A.No.3 of 2024 in O.S.No.17 of 2023 on the file of the Principal District Judge Ariyalur, the defendants 2 and 8 have preferred this revision petition.
2. After the amendment, the defendants sought permission of the Court to file additional written statement in IA No. 3 of 2024, which was dismissed by the trial court. Aggrieved over the same, the defendants 2 and 8 have preferred this revision petition.
3. Notice served. The counsel for the respondent also appeared.
4. Admittedly, now the case is ripe for trial. At this stage, some of the purchasers were impleaded and mother of the plaintiff also been impleaded. Therefore, the second defendant wants to file additional written statement. But the same was dismissed by the trial judge by holding that now he wants to implead totally different defendants, for which he is not entitled. Accordingly, the application was dismissed. But after impleading
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
