R.Mahalakshmi vs The Taxing Officer, Regional Transport Office, Coimbatore South, Coimbatore

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35172

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
R.Mahalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
The Taxing Officer, Regional Transport Office, Coimbatore South, Coimbatore – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms.R.Mahalakshmi (No appearance)
For the Respondents: Mrs.S.Anitha, Spl.G.P. for RR1 to 5, Mr.S.R.Sundar for R6

ORDER

When the matter is taken up on hearing on 09.04.2026, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was posted on 10.04.2026 under the caption for dismissal. On 10.04.2026, the learned counsel for the petitioner has given a change of vakalat and accordingly, the matter was listed on 16.04.2026 (today) under the very same caption.

2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Though the present writ petition is of the year 2024, the petitioner has not taken any steps to prosecute the case. Hence, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35172

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASKRISHNAN RAMASAMY, JR.Mahalakshmi – AppellantVersusThe Taxing Officer, Regional Transport Office, Coimbatore South, Coimbatore – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
R.Mahalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
The Taxing Officer, Regional Transport Office, Coimbatore South, Coimbatore – Respondent