Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
G. Sankaran – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Krishnagiri – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks survey of claimed property. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. notices accepted; no merits opinion. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. direct survey post-notice within 12 weeks. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the second and third respondents to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application dated 25.03.2026 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2. The petitioner had submitted an online application on 25.03.2026 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
3. Mr. C. Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Mr. V. Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) accepts notice on behalf of the fourth respondent. Since no adverse orders are passed against the fifth respondent, notice to the fifth respondent is dispensed with by this Court.
4. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s application.
5. No prejudice will be caused to the second and third respondents if the said authorities are directed to survey an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
