Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35268
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
A.Udaya Jesi Mala – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Education Officer Education Department Tirunelveli – Respondent
Important Points
Petition withdrawn with liberty to refile at appropriate stage.
Subject
Civil - Writ Petition
Act Referred
Constitution of India: S.226
Tamil Nadu Private Schools (Regulation) Act
Tamil Nadu Private Schools (Regulation) Act
Headnote
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to restrain respondents from acting on a complaint alleged to stem from personal animosity, invoking provisions of the Tamil Nadu Private Schools (Regulation) Act and Rules. The court noted the petitioner's request for withdrawal. No substantive findings were made by the court. Issues were not adjudicated due to withdrawal. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the court again at an appropriate stage.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Anand
For the Respondents: Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Anand
For the Respondents: Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition withdrawn with liberty to refile. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach this Court again at the appropriate stage and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty as prayed for.
3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. No costs.
