Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
N.Gopi Sankar – Appellant
Versus
The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai 625 002. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. no pending case; impoundment lacks statutory basis. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. quash order, release passport, no costs. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
ORDER
The petitioner challenges the communication dated 18.03.2026 issued by the first respondent. In the said communication, a decision is taken to impound the passport bearing No.W9646925 citing that a criminal case is pending before the Court. The impounding of passport was in exercise of its power under Section 10(3) (e) of the Passports Act, 1967.
2. Heard the learned counsel on either side.
3. A criminal case was registered against the petitioner in Crime No. 375 of 2011 and the validity of the registration of the said crime number was assailed by the petitioner before this Court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.10257 of 2023 and the petitioner contends that the further investigation has been stayed by this Court.
4. Reading of the Section 10(3) of the Passports Act, 1967, clearly reveals that the Passport authority can impound the passport only if a case is pending against the petitioner in a criminal Court. In the instant, no criminal case is pending against the petitioner in any criminal court in India and therefore, the impounding of the Passport of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
