Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, K.K. Ramakrishnan, JJ
Reliance General Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Unnikrishnan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accident facts, evidence, and tribunal's negligence and pay-recovery findings. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. rival submissions on liability, income, and quantum. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. negligence confirmed by eyewitness and police report. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. notional income and quantum upheld per syed sadiq. (Para 9) |
| 5. pay-recovery valid; appeal dismissed, award confirmed. (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN.J,) The appellant/Insurance Company herein is the second respondent in M.C.O.P. No. 4 of 2023 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Sattur.
2. Facts of the case:
The case arises out of a road accident involving a two-wheeler bearing Registration No. KL-01-CA-9773, which was insured with the appellant. On 03.06.2017, at about 6:30 p.m., the deceased, Kanagalakshmi, while proceeding on a bicycle on Sattur to Kovilpatti National Highway near Vaiparu Bridge, was hit by the said insured two-wheeler, which was ridden in a rash and negligent manner. Due to the impact, the deceased sustained grievous injuries and subsequently succumbed to the same.
2.1. The claimants, being the legal heirs of the deceased, filed the clai
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
