Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J
M.Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, V-4, Rajamangalam Police Station, Chennai (Crime No.469 of 2024) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners deny cheating in jewel pledge loan dispute (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. loan based on re-pledging representation not fulfilled (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. disputed facts bar quashing of fir (Para 6) |
ORDER
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records in Crime No. 469 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent police and to quash the same.
2. The petitioners, who are facing proceedings in Crime No.469 of 2024 for offences under Sections 420 and 34 , have filed this quash petition. The contention of the petitioners is that they had pledged jewels with Rupeek Bank, which allegedly charged exorbitant interest. The petitioners claim that they have initiated action against the said Bank. It is further submitted that, even according to the complainant, a sum of Rs. 18,50,862/- was transferred to Rupeek Bank, and the petitioners did not receive any amount. Hence, it is argued that no offence of cheating is made out.
3. The petitioners further contend that Rupeek Bank, after receiving the funds from the defacto complainant Bank, adjusted the loan towards the account of the petitioner's son without his knowledge or consent. In this regard, the petitioners state
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
