Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. Lakshminarayanan, J
Rasiya Beevi – Appellant
Versus
Meharinnisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. suit facts and amendment application for survey number correction. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. parties' contentions on due diligence and delay. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. amendment permissible without prejudice despite delay if no surprise. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. revision allowed with costs condition. (Para 19) |
ORDER
Heard Mr.Suriya for the civil revision petitioner and Mr.M.Suresh for the respondent.
2.For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as their ranks in the suit.
3.The plaintiff is the civil revision petitioner. She presented a suit in O.S.No.29 of 2020 for the relief of permanent injunction. The suit was presented through a power agent, by name, Shaul Hameed. When the plaint was presented, the suit property was shown as SF.No.181/1 of Rethinakkottai Village, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
4.Summons were served on the defendant. The defendant filed a detailed written statement, including denying the aspect that no such S.F.No.181/1 exists in the field.
5.On the basis of these pleadings, issues were framed and the parties went for trial.
6.The power agent was examined as P.W1. He was cross- examined on 04.06.2025. The
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
