Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
Kamalam – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks refund of excess stamp duty on rectification deed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. no prejudice in considering representation on merits. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. direct consideration within eight weeks; petition disposed. (Para 7) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to refund the excess stamp duty and registration charges of Rs.1,07,800/- based on the petitioner’s representation dated 26.02.2026.
2. According to the petitioner, she is not liable to pay the stamp duty for the rectification deed, registered as document No.5855 of 2025 on the file of the third respondent. According to the petitioner, in order to get the rectification deed released, the petitioner had to pay the excess stamp duty of Rs.1,07,800/-. According to the petitioner, the rectification deed was executed only to rectify the typographical mistakes committed in the earlier settlement deed, and therefore, there was no necessity for the petitioner to pay the stamp duty of a sum of Rs.1,07,800/- for the execution and registration of the rectification deed.
3. The petitioner had given a representation on 26.02.2026 to the respondents, requesting them to refund the sum of Rs. 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
