Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ANITA SUMANTH, SUNDER MOHAN, JJ
Bonda Sambasivarao – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. father alleges daughter's abduction; court directs police action. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. adult daughter's consensual relationship and independence recognized. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. petition closed after ascertaining daughter's wishes. (Para 5) |
For Petitioner : Mr.M.I.Javid Akbar For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.N.Narkeeran for R1 to R4 ORDER (Made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.)
The father of one Ramya Sree (absentee) has instituted this petition as he is aggrieved by his daughter’s disappearance from the house from 31.03.2026 onwards. He had apprehended, based on information received by him, that she had been abducted by R5 and R6.
2. We had issued notices on the date when the matter was listed for admission and directed the authorities to act on the complaint of the petitioner to secure his daughter.
3. Today, the petitioner, the absentee and R5 are in the Court. We have nothing to say in regard to the relationship, if any, between the absentee and R5 though it is evident that there are in a consensual relationship together. There is no dispute in regard to the age of the absentee, and her date of birth is 14.09.2007. She has conversed wit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
