SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35449

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ANITA SUMANTH, SUNDER MOHAN, JJ
Bonda Sambasivarao – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Police – Respondent
H.C.P.No.694 of 2026



Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.M.I.Javid Akbar
For Respondents: Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.N.Narkeeran for R1 to R4

Adult daughter's autonomy in consensual relationship and independent living upheld in habeas corpus petition.

Headnote:Article 226 of the Constitution of India enables issuance of writ of habeas corpus to produce a person and secure liberty. Father filed petition alleging abduction of 18-year-old daughter by respondents. Court directed police to act on complaint and secure daughter. Court found daughter in consensual relationship, not favoring family-arranged marriage, and wished to pursue studies independently. Issues framed as daughter's whereabouts and production before court. Court observed parties are adults, recorded daughter's preference to live separately, directed return of her ID and college materials. Habeas corpus petition closed.

Table of Content
1. father alleges daughter's abduction; court directs police action. (Para 1 , 2)
2. adult daughter's consensual relationship and independence recognized. (Para 3 , 4)
3. petition closed after ascertaining daughter's wishes. (Para 5)

For Petitioner : Mr.M.I.Javid Akbar For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.N.Narkeeran for R1 to R4 ORDER (Made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.)

The father of one Ramya Sree (absentee) has instituted this petition as he is aggrieved by his daughter’s disappearance from the house from 31.03.2026 onwards. He had apprehended, based on information received by him, that she had been abducted by R5 and R6.

2. We had issued notices on the date when the matter was listed for admission and directed the authorities to act on the complaint of the petitioner to secure his daughter.

3. Today, the petitioner, the absentee and R5 are in the Court. We have nothing to say in regard to the relationship, if any, between the absentee and R5 though it is evident that there are in a consensual relationship together. There is no dispute in regard to the age of the absentee, and her date of birth is 14.09.2007. She has conversed with her father in the Court room. Per our conversation with her, her family appears to be making arrangements for her marriage with a boy in their community which she is not in favour of. We leave it to the parties, all of whom are adults, to work out their personal arrangements inter se, in an amicable manner.

4. Since the absentee says that she would prefer to live outside of her paternal home, we record the same. She is now studying the first year of the B.Com., and wishes to complete the same with her own resources. Let her ID card and other college materials be given to her to ensure that she complete the course.

5. As nothing further survives for our adjudication, this habeas corpus petition is closed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top