SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35454

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
Micheal Rani – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Chengalpattu District – Respondent



Advocates:
For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Madhankumar
For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Shahjahan, SGP

Mandamus directing authorities to consider bunk shop allotment representation of physically challenged person on merits within time frame.

Headnote:Physically challenged petitioner sought allotment of a bunk shop at Mudichur Road, Tambaram, through representation dated 28.03.2026 to relevant authorities. Court found no prejudice to respondents in considering the representation on merits with supporting documents. Directions issued without expressing opinion on merits. Issue framed as directing consideration of representation for bunk shop allotment to physically challenged person. Ratio: No prejudice caused by timely consideration on merits and in accordance with law. Writ petition disposed directing second respondent to pass final orders within 12 weeks. No costs.

Table of Content
1. petition for bunk shop allotment to physically challenged person. (Para 1 , 2)
2. no prejudice in considering representation on merits. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. directions for final orders within 12 weeks. (Para 6)

Order

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to allot a bunk shop to the petitioner at Mudichur Road, Tambaram, based on the representation of the petitioner dated 28.03.2026, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.According to the petitioner, she is a physically challenged person. She had made a representation on 28.03.2026 to the respondents requesting them to allot a bunk shop at Mudichur Road, Tambaram. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed writ petition.

3.Mr.M.Shahjahan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.

6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 28.03.2026 seeking for allotment of a bunk shop at Mudichur Road, Tambaram, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top