Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Sounthar, J
K.Vijayakumar – Appellant
Versus
M.Subramani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks condonation of 1007-day delay due to missing decree page and misplaced bundle. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. vague reasons and lack of supporting affidavits fail to justify inordinate delay. (Para 3 , 4) |
COMMON ORDER
This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 1007 days delay in filing the second appeal.
2. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, it is stated by the petitioner that the judgment and decree of the first appellate court was made ready on 28.10.2022, however, in the decree copy furnished to him, page No.2 was missing. Therefore, he requested his counsel, who appeared before the trial court to file a fresh copy application and obtain a new certified copy of the decree for the purpose of filing second appeal. It is also stated in the affidavit that in the interregnum period case bundle has been misplaced and it was traced out only recently. On these reasonings, the petitioner seeks condone the delay of 1007 days in filing the second appeal.
3. It is seen from the typed set of papers that certified copy of the judgment of the first appellate court was received by the petitioner on 28.10.2022. However, the cop
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
