SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35509

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
M.Perumal S/o.Muthu Gounder – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, District Collector’s Office Complex, Thummankurichi Post, Namakkal Taluk. – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Senthil
For the Respondents: Mr.D.Ravichander, Special Government Pleader

Mandamus issued directing consideration of representation for referring land acquisition compensation dispute to competent court under Tamil Nadu Highways Act.

Headnote:Under Section 20 of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001, land in S.No.72/4A of Pillanallur Village was acquired by Award No.8/2012-13 dated 30.09.2013 for a bypass road. Petitioner submitted representation dated 28.04.2014 seeking reference to competent court for enhanced compensation, which remained unaddressed. Court finds no prejudice to respondents in directing consideration. Issue framed is whether respondents should refer the matter for enhanced compensation determination. Ratio: Direction for final orders on representation merits lawful, as no counter prejudice exists, enabling petitioner relief under the Act. Writ petition disposed directing first respondent to pass final orders on merits within four weeks; no costs.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks reference for enhanced compensation post-acquisition award. (Para 1 , 2)
2. direction issued for consideration of representation within timeframe. (Para 3 , 4)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a limited relief. The petitioner seeks for referring the matter to the competent Court to enable the petitioner to get enhanced compensation for the property more fully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, which were acquired under the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001, by award dated 30.09.2013.

2. The petitioner had given a representation on 28.04.2014 to the first respondent for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3. Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if a direction is issued to the first respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 28.04.2014 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the first respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 28.04.2014 seeking for referring the matter to the competent Court to enable the petitioner to get enhanced compensation in respect of the property more fully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, which was acquired from the petitioner under the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 by award dated 30.09.2013, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top