Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35547
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District – Respondent
WMP NO. 6284 OF 2023
Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr.J.Titus Enock
For the Respondent(s): Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader For R1 & R2, Mr.R.Prabakar, For R3
For the Petitioner(s): Mr.J.Titus Enock
For the Respondent(s): Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader For R1 & R2, Mr.R.Prabakar, For R3
Settlement between parties renders writ petition infructuous and liable to dismissal.
Headnote:First Paragraph: The petition challenges orders dated 7.04.2022 and 9.07.2022 under writ jurisdiction pursuant to Article 226. Essential facts involve a dispute resolved amicably between parties. Court finds no further adjudication necessary due to settlement. Second Paragraph: No formal issues framed as matter settled prior to hearing. Ratio: Settlement between parties renders petition infructuous. Third Paragraph: Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. matter settled; petition infructuous. (Para 1 , 2) |
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent would submit that the matter has been settled between the parties and hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in the present case.
2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
