IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
B.PUGALENDHI, J
Sheik Mohamed – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu rep by Sub Inspector of Police, Marthandam Police Station, Kanyakumari District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks case transfer due to bar boycott. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. rival submissions on alleged resolution absence. (Para 3) |
ORDER
The defacto complainant in this case is an Advocate practising in Kuzhithurai. Therefore, the petitioner has filed this petition seeking transfer of the case in CC.No.703 of 2025 from the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were informed that there is a resolution passed by the Bar barring Kuzhithurai and Kanyakumari Advocates appearing on behalf of the petitioners. The learned counsel by referring to the orders of this court passed in CrlOP(MD)No.19341 of 2019 dated 02.01.2020 and Crl OP(MD)No.16202 of 2022, dated 11.11.2022 submits that this court has entertained the similar petitions seeking transfer of cases, in which the defacto complainants are practising advocates, from the courts of Kanyakumari to other courts.
3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submits that there is no such resolution as alleged by the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.