Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
C.Sivan – Appellant
Versus
The Joint-I, Sub-Registrar, Krishnagiri – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges sub-registrar's refusal to register sale deed due to pending suit. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's contentions on non-speaking order and natural justice violation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. no injunction exists; order non-speaking and without hearing. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. quash order, remand for fresh reasoned decision post-hearing. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed, challenging the impugned order dated
16.09.2025 passed by the first respondent, refusing to register the sale deed presented by the petitioner for registration on the ground that there is a civil suit pending over the very same property.
2. According to the petitioner, he is the absolute owner of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. According to the petitioner, the civil court has not restrained the Registration Department from registering any document. Therefore, according to him, by total non application of mind, the impugned order has been passed.
3. The petitioner has also challenged the impugned order on the ground that it is a non speaking order with regard to the contentions of the petitioner and on the ground that the impugned order has been pass
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
