IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
C.Sivan – Appellant
Versus
The Joint-I, Sub-Registrar, Krishnagiri – Respondent
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed, challenging the impugned order dated 16.09.2025 passed by the first respondent, refusing to register the sale deed presented by the petitioner for registration on the ground that there is a civil suit pending over the very same property.
2. According to the petitioner, he is the absolute owner of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. According to the petitioner, the civil court has not restrained the Registration Department from registering any document. Therefore, according to him, by total non application of mind, the impugned order has been passed.
3. The petitioner has also challenged the impugned order on the ground that it is a non speaking order with regard to the contentions of the petitioner and on the ground that the impugned order has been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not afforded any opportunity of hearing prior to the passing of the impugned order.
4. Mr. P. Harish, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of R1 and Mr. V. Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) accepts notice on behalf of R2. Since no adverse orders are passed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.