Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
PVS Granites Represented by its Partner, Mr.Vinodkumar S. – Appellant
Versus
The Additional Chief Secretary (FAC), Natural Resources Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges insistence on additional stamp duty for supplementary lease deed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents confirm non-presentation; petitioner undertakes to present deed. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court directs presentation and reasoned registration decision within timelines. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the third respondent to receive and register the supplementary lease deed dated 05.02.2026 to be presented by the petitioner for registration without insisting upon any additional stamp duty as per the proceedings of the second respondent dated 05.02.2026.
2. According to the petitioner, earlier M/s.Sri Vari Granites had registered a lease deed on 14.03.2022 for a period of twenty years. According to the petitioner, even before the expiry of the said lease, M/s.Sri Vari Granites had transferred the lease in favour of the petitioner with respect to the balance period. There became a necessity for execution of the supplementary lease deed dated 05.02.2026 between the petitioner, M/s.Sri Vari Granites and the second respondent. According to the petitioner, permission was also granted to the petitioner for transfer of leas
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
