SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35652

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hemant Chandangoudar, J
V.Pandi – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai – Respondent



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Arunmozhi Rajashankar
For the Respondents: Mr. P.Subbaraj, Special Government Pleader for R1 to R4 : Mr.A.K.Manikkam for R5

Construction of road on private land without due process violates Article 300A right to property.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Article 300A of the Constitution mandates that no person shall be deprived of property except by authority of law. Petitioner, joint owner of land in S.No.93/9B-1, challenged unauthorized construction of Thar road without due process. Court found violation of constitutional right to property as road laid arbitrarily without legal procedure. Second Paragraph: Key issue was whether laying road on private land without due process violated Article 300A. Ratio: Respondents failed to follow mandatory procedure despite joint ownership confirmed by survey and patta; public utility insufficient without lawful acquisition. Third Paragraph: Writ Petition disposed directing removal of unauthorized Thar road within six weeks.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks removal of unauthorized road on private land. (Para 1 , 2)
2. road serves public access, confirmed joint ownership. (Para 3 , 4)
3. due process mandatory before encroaching private land. (Para 6)
4. direct removal of road within six weeks ordered. (Para 7)

O R D E R

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for a direction to the respondents to remove the Government Thar Road in S.No.93/9B at Arambanoor II Pit, Arumbanoor Village, Madurai District.

2. The petitioner claims to be the joint owner of the S.No.93/9B-1 measuring to an extent of 0.23.70 ares. The petitioner states that the respondents without following due process of law has laid the Government road which is in violation of Article 300 A of the Constitution of India.

3. The 5th respondent has filed counter affidavit stating that the Firka Surveyor, Arumbanur, has conducted a survey on 15.03.2024 and submitted a report stating that the said land jointly belongs to the petitioner and two other individuals and patta was assigned and patta bearing No. 406 was issued in their names and the Thar road is laid in the said land.

4. It is further stated that the Thar road serves as the public pathway enabling the people to travel from the nearby villages and the said road is the only access to Government Primary School, Primary Health Centre and E-Seva Centre, etc., 5. It is further stated that the said road was upgraded to District Road Standards and handed over to Highways Department on 27.10.2017 and the road was laid in 2021 and currently the said road is under the maintenance of the Highways Department.

6. In any event, the said land jointly belongs to the petitioner and two other individuals and the respondent before laying the Thar road on the said land ought to have followed due process of law. Without following due process of law, the respondent has laid the Thar road and the same is arbitrary and discriminatory.

7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to remove the unauthorized Thar road laid in S.No.93/9B-1 within a period of six(6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top