SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35697

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SRIMATHY, J
R.Rajagopal – Appellant
Versus
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sub-Collector Office, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.Gurumoorthy.S
For R-1 & R-2:Mr.A.Oliraja Government Advocate

Mandamus directs authorities to decide representations after fair enquiry and hearing within stipulated time.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus to direct the Revenue Divisional Officer to consider a representation dated 12.02.2025 and pass final orders after proper enquiry and hearing. The representation was registered, and an enquiry conducted, but no final orders passed. The court directed consideration of the representation and, if necessary, re-enquiry with notice to parties. The issue framed was the failure to pass final orders on the representation despite enquiry. The court's reasoning emphasized procedural fairness, directing notice and opportunity of hearing before final orders. The writ petition is disposed of with directions to pass final orders within two months, no order as to costs.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks mandamus for final orders on representation after enquiry. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court directs decision with re-enquiry and notice within two months. (Para 3 , 4)

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY R.Rajagopal ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sub-Collector Office, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

2. The Tahsildar, Thiruvidaimaruthur Taluk, Thanjavur District.

3. Kanagavalli

4. Seethalakshmi ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to consider and pass final orders on the petitioner's representation dated 12.02.2025 (registered as Ka.29/2025/A3) and the subsequent reminder dated 16.03.2026, after conducting a proper enquiry and affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the Respondents 3 and 4, within a time frame fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.Gurumoorthy.S For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.A.Oliraja Government Advocate

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider and pass final orders on the petitioner's representation dated 12.02.2025 (registered as Ka.29/2025/A3) and the subsequent reminder dated 16.03.2026, after conducting a proper enquiry and affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the Respondents 3 and 4.

2. Based on the petitioner's complaint, the official respondent has registered the case and an enquiry was also conducted. However, final orders have not been passed.

3. Therefore, the first respondent is directed to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 12.02.2025 and pass final orders. If the Tahsildar is of the opinion that a re-enquiry is necessary, the same may be conducted after issuing notice to the petitioner as well as respondents 3 and 4, and thereafter, pass appropriate orders within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top