IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SENTHILKUMAR, J
Visu.S. S/o.Swaminathan – Appellant
Versus
Director of School Education – Respondent
WP No. 37826 of 2016 | WMP No. 32413 of 2016
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges rejection of teacher's appointment approval. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's resignation renders petition infructuous. (Para 3) |
| 3. writ petition closed without adjudication. (Para 4) |
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 4th Respondent in his proceedings in O.Mu.No.2807 A2/2015 dated 19.08.2016 and quash the same and direct the Respondents 1 to 4 to accord approval for the Writ Petitioner’s appointment to the post of P.G.Assistant (English) in the 5th Respondent’s school as per its request dated 25.10.2012 and pay salary and other benefits to the writ petitioner.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Hariharan, for Mr.A.Muthukumar For Respondent(s): Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai, Government Advocate for R1 to R4, R5-No Appearance
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed to call for the records of the 4th Respondent in his proceedings in O.Mu.No.2807 A2/2015 dated 19.08.2016 and quash the same and direct the Respondents 1 to 4 to accord approval for the Writ Petitioner’s appointment to the post of P.G.Assistant (English) in the 5th Respondent’s school as per his request dated 25.10.2012 and pay salary and other benefits to the writ petitioner.
2.Pursuant to the proceedings of the 5th Respondent/school in Na.Ka.No.40/A3/2012 dated 25.10.2012, the writ petitioner was appointed as PG Teacher (English), in the vacancy which arose due to the voluntary retirement from service (VRS) of Tmt.S.R.Selvarani on 15.02.2011.
3.As per the written instructions received from the 3rd respondent, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that the writ petitioner tendered his resignation on 01.06.2019. It was further submitted that the writ petitioner had obtained a double degree, which is contrary to service rules. In view of the petitioner’s resignation from service dated
01.06.2019, nothing survives in this writ petition.
4.Recording the aforesaid submissions made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, this Court holds that nothing survives for adjudication in this writ Petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.