SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35823

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hemant Chandangoudar, J
M/s. Solsun Lifecare Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
The State Tax Officer, Nagercoil-1 – Respondent
W.M.P(MD)No.8107 of 2026



Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.S.Karunakar
For Respondent: Mr.R.Sureshkumar Additional Government Pleader

Ex parte GST assessment set aside for violation of natural justice; fresh order after hearing required.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged an ex parte GST assessment order dated 22.08.2024 under Article 226, seeking quashing for violation of natural justice principles, including lack of opportunity to reply or hearing. Facts involved issuance of notice via online portal without petitioner objections due to difficulties. Court found ex parte assessment adversely affected rights, warranting interference. Issues framed as validity of ex parte assessment despite online notice service and petitioner's failure to object. Ratio: Proper notice and hearing essential; ex parte orders set aside if opportunity denied, allowing fresh assessment post-objections. Writ petition allowed; impugned order set aside, petitioner permitted to file objections within 30 days, respondent to pass fresh orders within further 30 days.

Table of Content
1. challenges ex parte gst assessment order (Para 1)
2. parties' submissions on notice and objections (Para 2 , 3)
3. ex parte order prejudices petitioner rights (Para 4)
4. set aside order; permit fresh assessment (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

ORDER

The petitioner challenges the assessment order dated 22.08.2024 passed by the sole respondent, whereby a demand was raised for payment of a sum of Rs.14,709/- towards CGST, SGST, and IGST, a sum of Rs.11,495/- towards interest, and a sum of Rs.40,000/- towards penalty.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the assessment was made ex parte and, therefore, the same has adversely affected the petitioner’s rights and defence.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that notice had been issued through the online portal and, despite service of notice, the petitioner did not choose to file any objections. Therefore, according to the respondent, the assessment order does not warrant interference.

4. Admittedly, notice was issued to the petitioner. However, the petitioner, citing certain difficulties, failed to submit objections. If the ex parte assessment is not set aside, the petitioner would be put to serious monetary loss.

5. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned assessment order dated 22.08.2024 bearing No. GSTIN 33AAXCS3278A1Z6/2019-20 passed by the respondent is hereby set aside. The petitioner is permitted to file objections within a period of thirty (30) days from today. If such objections are filed within the said period, the respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a further period of thirty (30) days thereafter.

6. It is made clear that if the petitioner fails to file objections within the stipulated time, the respondent shall be at liberty to proceed further in accordance with law.

7. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top