Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
A.Senthil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Collector / RDO, Sub Collector Office, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondent concedes review under g.o. guidelines. (Para 3) |
| 2. court quotes g.o.ms.no.81 suspension guidelines. (Para 4) |
| 3. direct review of suspension within four weeks. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking writ of mandamus directing the respondents to revoke the orders of suspension issued by the first respondent vide proceeding No.A1/7033/2025 dated
02.09.2025.
2.Consequent upon registration of a vigilance case in Crime No.
9 of 2025 dated 13.08.2025, the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody. The petitioner was placed under suspension through proceedings dated 02.09.2025 and he has been continuing under suspension till date. Under those circumstances, the petitioner claims to have submitted his representation dated 16.03.2026 requesting for review of suspension and for posting him at a non-sensitive post. Complaining against the inaction on the part of the respondents on the said representation, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.
3.Mr.B.Ramanathan, learned Additional Government Pleader, fairly submitted that the suspension order issued against the petitioner on 02.09.2025 is required to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
