IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.Jagadish Chandira, J
Ponnusamy – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
CRL MP Nos. 2081, 2078 & 5394 of 2026|CRL OP No.1200 of 2026|CRL OP No.1173 of 2026|CRL OP No.5994 of 2026|Cr.No. 21/2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prosecution case: land forgery and threats. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners deny role; oppose bail. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court assesses documents; no custody needed. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. bail granted with conditions. (Para 11 , 12) |
This petition has been filed seeking to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in respect of Crime No. 21 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Dharapuram Police Station, Tiruppur District.
This petition has been filed seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of her arrest in respect of Cr.No.21 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Dharapuram Police station, Tiruppur District.
PRAYER IN CRL OP No. 5994 of 2026:
This petition has been filed seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in respect of Cr.No.21 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Dharapuram Police station, Tiruppur District.
CRL OP No. 1200 of 2026:
For Petitioner(s): Mrs. S.Suriya Priya(VC)
For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udayakumar,G.A(Crl.Side)
For Intervener Mr.J.Mohan Prasath CRL OP No. 1173 of 2026:
For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Shanmugasundaram, Sr.Advocate assisted by Ms.A.G.Shakeena For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udayakumar, G.A(Crl.Side)
For Intervener Mr.J.Mohan Prasath CRL OP No.5994 of 2026:
For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Manokaran for Mr.N.Ponraj For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udayakumar,G.A(Crl.Side)
For Intervener Mr.J.Mohan Prasath
COMMON ORDER
These petitions have been filed seeking to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in respect of Crime No. 21 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Dharapuram Police Station, Tiruppur District.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the de facto complainant was working as a Forest Officer and got retired in the year 2023. While so, on 18.06.2008, the de facto complainant purchased a land measuring 1 acre at Old S.F No.2538 (New S.F.No.101/8) for a value of Rs.1 lakh from one S.K. Thangavel vide a sale deed which was registered on the file of the Sub- Registrar, Erode. The said land was situated behind the land of the de facto complainant's wife. In the above said land, the de facto complainant is running an establishment in the name and style of ‘’Karmugil Nattrupannal’’ and has obtained all the documents in his name from the Government. While so, in the year 2022, when the de facto complainant was working in Vallanadu Forest area, the Dharapuram Surveyor contacted him through cell phone and informed him that he received an application from one Selvaraj to survey informing that his land is situated within the land of de facto complainant and further, asked the de facto complainant to come in person. Thereafter, in the year 2022, the said Surveyor, along with Village Administrative Officer and others, came to the land of the de facto complainant and informed that they had come for survey of his land. However, when the same was resisted by the de facto complainant, they went back without measuring. Then, after one month, the said Selvaraj gave a complaint against the de facto complainant before the Superintendent of Police, before whom, the de facto complainant also appeared and produced all documents and the enquiry was concluded directing them to approach the civil Court. Thereafter, when the de facto complainant enquired further, it came to light that a forged document has been created as if his vendor S.K. Thangavel had sold 10 cents to one Subramaniya Gounder, S/o. Thirumalaisamy Gounder and Nachimuthu Gounder,S/o. Pannusamy Gounder, pursuant to which, a Power of Attorney dated 22.07.2008 was given to one Ponnusamy, an Ex.MLA (A-1). Then, the said Ponnusamy, with the help of the petitioners, obtained a life certificate for the deceased Nachimuthu Gounder and Subramaniya Gounder and created a fraudulent sale deed on 02.12.2021 in the name of Selvaraj (A-4). While so, it is further alleged that when the de facto complainant was gathering details for lodging complaint, A-1's wife namely
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.