Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J
R.Dharani – Appellant
Versus
K.Manikandan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks transfer of divorce case citing wife's travel hardship. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. respondent absent despite notices. (Para 4 , 7) |
| 3. supreme court precedent prioritizes wife's convenience in transfers. (Para 6) |
| 4. transfer allowed to family court, karur. (Para 8 , 9) |
O R D E R
The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking orders to withdraw the petition in H.M.O.P.No.188 of 2025 pending on the file of the Sub Court, Pattukkottai, Thanjavur District and transfer the same to the Family Court, Karur District.
2. It is evident from the records that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 01.06.2020 as per Hindu Rites and customs and due to their wedlock, they were blessed with a female child and that subsequently, there arose some misunderstanding between them and they are are living separately.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the respondent has filed a divorce petition in H.M.O.P.No.188 of 2025, before the Sub Court, Pattukkottai, Thanajvur District.
4. When the matter was taken up on 27.03.2026, despite receipt of Court notice as well private notice, the respondent has not turned up. Even toda
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
