Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
V.Jayaseelan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Kanyakumari District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prayer for mandamus to permit quarry operation post-lease. (Para 1) |
| 2. quarry inoperative due to respondent orders during lease. (Para 2) |
| 3. rule 8(8) prohibits lease extensions strictly. (Para 3) |
| 4. prior ruling confirms no extension; writ dismissed. (Para 4 , 5) |
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 09.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P(MD)No.6964 of 2026 V.Jayaseelan ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District.
2.The Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining Collectorate, Kanyakumari District @ Nagercoil. ...Respondents Writ Petition is filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant permission to operate the quarry in S.F.No.433/2A1(P) and 433/2A2(P) of Villukuri Village, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District, to an extent of 0.84.5 hectares for a period of 8 months (non-operative period) for which the petitioner was not permitted to quarry during the lease period accorded vide 1st respondent proceedings in R.C.No.400/G&M/2008 dated 22.01.2015 consequently, direct the 2nd respondent to issue transport permit t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
