Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35912
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
M.Gobinath – Appellant
Versus
State Commissioner Avl ( A & E), O/o. the State Accountant General – Respondent
Writ Petition
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s/ H.Jasima Yasmin, M/s.Ajmal Associates
For the Respondents: Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader, Mr.P.Gunasekaran
Prior aided school service before 2003 does not entitle old pension for post-2003 government appointments under CPS.
Headnote:The petitioner, initially appointed in an aided school prior to 2003, sought placement under the old pension scheme upon later government service entry under the Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS) post-01.04.2003. Relevant government orders permit prior aided service for selection/special grades but not pension benefits. Court found no legal provision entitling prior aided service to override CPS applicability. Issue framed: Whether prior aided school service qualifies petitioner for old pension despite 2007 government appointment under CPS. Ratio: CPS applies to appointments after 01.04.2003; prior aided service countable only for grades, not pension entitlement, absent specific G.O. or law. Writ petition dismissed at admission stage; no merits found.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's service history from aided to government school. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. cps governs post-2003 appointments despite prior service. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. writ dismissed; no pension entitlement. (Para 6) |
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 09.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR M.Gobinath ... Petitioner Vs.
1. State Commissioner Avl ( A & E), O/o. the State Accountant General, 361, Anna Salai, Chennai- 600018..
2. The Chief Educational Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District..
3. The District Educational Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
4. The Correspondent, Government Higher Secondary School, Senthurai, Natham (Taluk), Dindigul. ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS directing the respondents to place the Petitioner under the old pension scheme considering his appointment as P.G. Assistant (Mathematics) on 22.09.1993 at Montfort Anglo Indian Higher Secondary School, Yercaud, Salem within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : M/s/ H.Jasima Yasmin M/s.Ajmal Associates For R2 to R4 : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader For R1 : Mr.P.Gunasekaran
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to place the petitioner under the old pension scheme considering his appointment as P.G.Assistant (Mathematics) on 22.09.1993 at Montfort Anglo Indian Higher Secondary School, Yercaud, Salem within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.
2. The petitioner herein, who was initially appointed as P.G.
Assistant(Mathematics)on 22.09.1993 at Montfort Anglo Indian Higher Secondary School, Yercaud, Salem, which is an aided school, resigned from the said post on 5.11.2002. Subsequently, he was again selected and appointed as B.T.Assistant on 04.10.2007 at Government Higher Secondary School, Erode District. It was thereafter the petitioner got selected as P.G. Assistant (Mathematics) in a recruitment undertaken by the Teachers Recruitment Board and was relieved from the post of B.T.Assistant on 02.02.2009 and he was appointed in the post of P.G.Assistant (Mathematics) in the Government Higher Secondary School, Kagguchi, Nilgiris District on 03.02.2009. It was thereafter the petitioner after having served for about more than 15 years as P.G.Assistant(Mathematics), retired from service on 31.05.2024.
3.The case of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that as soon as he was appointed as P.G.Assistant on 04.10.2007, he has been making a request for taking the service rendered by him as P.G Assistant (Mathematics) in Government Aided School upto 2009 into consideration and to extend the benefit of old pension scheme to him. But the said representations have not been considered and therefore, the petitioner claims to have submitted representations even after retirement from service, that is after 31.05.2024 and now approaching this Court by filing the present writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to treat him as the person covered by the old pension scheme instead of Contributory Pension Scheme.
4. This Court heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Gunasekaran, learned counsel for the first respondent and Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader for respondents 2 to 4.
5. A perusal of the order of appointment issued in favour of the petitioner as B.T.Assistant through the proceedings No.90256/C4/ Yee.1/2007 dated 26.09.2007 is very clear that the said appointment was made under Contributory Pension Scheme as it is evident from the condition No.9 of the said appointment order. Admittedly, the contribution has been deducted from the salary of the petitioner with effect from 26.09.2007 till the date of his retirement on 31.05.2024. It is after the petitioner retired from service, the petitioner has received all the benefits that are payable under Contri
