Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
G.Ambethrani – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, O/o.District Collectorate, Ramanathapuram District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's suspension due to vigilance case. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. government concedes need for review. (Para 4) |
| 3. indefinite suspension against public interest; court directs review. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Om Prakash, learned Government Advocate for the respondents.
2. By consent of both the parties, this writ putation is disposed of at the admission stage.
3. The petitioner, while working as Village Assistant at (Nagachi Group), Taluk office, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District, he was placed under suspension through the proceedings No. A5/1577/2025 Dated 21.03.2025 as he was involved in Vigilance and Anti-corruption case and was also remanded to judicial custody. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the said suspension order has not been reviewed even after a lapse of about a year. By relying on the Government Order in G.O.(Ms.)No.81, Human Resources Management(N) Department dated 04.08.2022, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents are under obligation to review the order of suspension in terms of the guidelines framed in the above Government Order.
4. The learned Government A
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
