Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.KUMARAPPAN, J
Isabella Danial – Appellant
Versus
State Represented by: The Inspector of Police Town Police Station, Ambur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim of cognizable offences in complaint. (Para 2) |
| 2. dispute civil; magistrate correctly dismissed. (Para 4) |
| 3. magistrate must judicially assess fir directions under bnss. (Para 5 , 6) |
PRAYER: This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Section 438 read with 442 of B.N.S.S. to call for the records related to the order dated 10.02.2026 passed in Crl.M.P,No. 205/2026 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambur and set aside the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent police to register the First Information Report on the petitioners complaint dated 11.12.2025.
For Petitioner(s): Mr. Thiyagarajan B For Respondent(s): Mr. R. Krishore Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) [for R1]
No appearance [for R2 to R5]
ORDER
This Criminal Revision petition has been filed as against the order dated 10.02.2026 passed in Crl.M.P,No. 205/2026 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambur.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that on perusal of the affidavit, there are cognizable offences. He would further submit that the learned Magistrate, instead of forwarding to register FIR, has dismissed the petition.
3.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
