COMMON ORDER

Challenging the impugned order passed in IA.No.9/2025 in OS.No. 8746 of 2022, IA No. 8 of 2025 in OS No. 9097 of 2022 and IA No.9 of 2025 in OS No.8747 of 2022, respectively dated 03.02.2026 on the file of the XII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, the defendants 1 and 3 have preferred these revisions.

2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioners submitted that before the trial Court, the plaintiff marked Exhibits A2 and A3, which were not enclosed along with the plaint at the time of filing the suit, nor was any permission sought to produce those additional documents. Without such permission, the documents were marked as Exhibits A2 and A3. Hence, he filed an application to de-mark those documents, which was not considered by the learned trial Judge, and therefore this revision has been preferred.

3. The learned counsel further argued that as per Order VII Rule 14 CPC, if any document is