SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35947

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J
R.Chandhira – Appellant
Versus
Mariyappan – Respondent
Tr.C.M.P (MD).No.624 of 2025 | C.M.P(MD)No.18041 of 2025 | H.M.O.P. No.59 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr.H.Jahir Hussain
For the Respondent: Mr.M.Pitchai Muthu

In matrimonial transfer petitions under Section 24 CPC, wife's convenience is generally prioritized.

Headnote:Under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, transfer petitions in matrimonial disputes require consideration of convenience, particularly the wife's, alongside economic and social factors. The parties married in 2015 per Hindu rites, later separated with divorce proceedings pending at Sub Court, Manapparai, and restitution petition at Family Court, Karur. The court found the petitioner's travel from Karur District burdensome. Issues framed around transfer feasibility given residence and convenience. Supreme Court in analogous case emphasized wife's convenience as paramount. The transfer petition was allowed.

Table of Content
1. background of marriage, separation, and pending divorce/restitution petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's travel hardship; no respondent objection. (Para 4 , 5)
3. supreme court precedent on wife's convenience in transfers. (Para 6)
4. petition allowed; case transferred to family court, karur. (Para 7 , 8)

O R D E R

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking orders to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.59 of 2024 from the file of the Sub Court, Manapparai, and transfer the same to the Family Court, Karur.

2. It is evident from the records that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 03.07.2015 as per Hindu Rites and customs and subsequently, there arose some misunderstanding between them and they are living separately.

3. It is not in dispute that the respondent has filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No.59 of 2024, seeking divorce and the same is pending on the file of the Sub Court, Manapparai and that the petitioner has filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No.162 of 2025, seeking restitution of conjugal rights and the same is pending on the file of the Family Court, Karur.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is residing at Kulithalai, Karur District and finds it very difficult to travel to Trichy to attend all the hearings.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that they are not having objections to transfer the case.

6. In the case of N.C.V.Aishwarya Vs. A.S.Saravana Karthik Sha reported in 2022 Live Law (SC) 627, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has reiterated the position with generally, it is the wife's convenience, which must be looked at while considering the transfer petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the relevant passage is extracted hereunder :

“The cardinal principle for exercise of power under Section

24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife's convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer.", the bench observed.”

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that the petitioner is residing at Karur District, this Court is inclined to allow this petition. Accordingly, the petition in H.M.O.P.No.59 of 2024, is ordered to be withdrawn from the file of the Sub Court, Manapparai and transfer the same to the Family Court, Karur. The learned Sub Judge, Manapparai, is hereby directed to transmit the entire records in H.M.O.P.No.59 of 2024 to the file of the Family Court, Karur, within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receiving the case bundle, the learned Judge, Family Court, Karur, is directed to take up the petition on file and proceed in accordance with law.

8. With the above direction, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top