Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
C.Chellakutty – Appellant
Versus
The Project Director Project Implementation Unit, National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks direction for representation consideration. (Para 1) |
| 2. representation considered; seeks leave to challenge. (Para 2) |
| 3. petition disposed with liberty to challenge order. (Para 3) |
ORDER
This writ petition is filed to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 11.02.2022.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the representation of the petitioner dated 11.02.2022 has already been considered and orders were passed by the second respondent on 25.04.2022. It is further submitted that the petitioner came to know of the said order only today and seeks leave of this Court to challenge the same before the competent authority.
3. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 25.04.2022 before the competent authority, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
