SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 36056

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
R.Ilango – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
WP(MD).No.30928 of 2025|WMP(MD)Nos.24110, 24112 & 24113 of 2025



Advocates:
For Petitioners:Mr.P.Murali, Advocate
For Respondents:Mr.P.S.Raman, Advocate General assisted by Mr.J.Ashok -For R1 to R6, Additional Government Pleader: Mr.P.Gunasekaran - For R7, Standing Counsel

No recovery of excess pay paid in selection grade prior to FR 22-B amendment; refixation prospective post-amendment.

Headnote:The petitioners challenge refixation of pay and recovery orders under G.O.(Ms.)No.234, Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated 01.06.2009 and G.O.(Ms.)No.23 dated 12.01.2011, seeking continuance of pre-01.06.2009 selection grade scale for Primary School Headmaster. Court notes identical issue decided in prior batch, setting aside recovery and directing pay refixation post FR 22-B amendment. No recovery from salaries, pensions or retiral benefits; arrears payable prospectively. Issue: Validity of pay refixation and recovery per 2009-2011 GOs. Ratio: Follows directions in W.P.No.12275/2024 batch (para 85), prohibiting recovery of prior payments, mandating FR 22-B amendment per G.O.Ms.No.63305/2010, allowing future refixation only prospectively with selection grade benefits after 10 years service. Writ petition disposed in terms of directions in W.P.No.12275/2024 batch dated 02.03.2026; no costs.

Table of Content
1. challenges pay refixation and recovery orders. (Para 1)
2. parties agree to prior batch directions. (Para 2 , 3)
3. quotes directions prohibiting recovery, mandating fr 22-b amendment. (Para 4)
4. disposes writ per prior order directions. (Para 5)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed against various orders passed by the respondent authorities re-fixing the pay of the petitioners and ordering for recovery of certain amounts pursuant to re-fixation of pay in terms of G.O.(Ms.)No.234, Finance (Pay and Cell) Department dated 01.06.2009 and G.O.(Ms.)No.23, Finance (Pay and Cell)

Department dated 12.01.2011.

2. Mr.P.S.Raman, learned Advocate General, assisted by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 6 fairly submitted that an identical issue has fallen for consideration before a Co-ordinate Bench of the Principal Seat of this Court in W.P.No.12275 of 2024 and batch and the said batch of writ petitions have been disposed of issuing various directions at paragraph No.85 of the said order, and as such this writ petition can also be disposed of on the same lines.

3. In response to the same, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in this writ petition has also agreed for the same.

4. In the light of the above, this Court, after perusing the order dated 02.03.2026, is of the considered view that this matter also can be disposed of in the light of various directions issued in W.P.No. 12275 of 2024 and batch dated 02.03.2026. The said directions issued at paragraph No.85 of the said order reads as under:

''i) The impugned order directing the fixation of the selection grade/special grade scale of pay at the first promotional level and 2nd promotional level is set aside to the extent that there shall be no recovery of amount, which has already been paid, from the petitioners; ii) Insofar as the petitioners, who have retired from service is concerned, no amount shall be recovered on the basis of the impugned order from the retiral benefits/pensionary benefits of the petitioners with regard to the amount already paid;

iii) Insofar as the petitioners, who are still in service, no amount shall be recovered on the basis of the impugned order from the salary of the petitioners with regard to the amount already paid;

iv) In case any amount has already been recovered from any of the petitioners towards excess payment made in the selection grade scale, the same shall not be refunded to the petitioners and the respondents shall refix the selection grade scale of pay of the said petitioners after amendment to FR 22-B and, thereafter, upon computation, if any amount is due and payable to any of petitioners, the same shall be paid by the respondents forthwith;

v) Until FR 22-B is amended so as to include the directions given in G.O. Ms. No.63305/Pay Cell/2010-1 dated 8.11.2010, more particularly para 4 (i) of the said Government Order, no action shall be taken by the respondents to refix the scale of pay of the petitioners and similarly placed persons;

vi) Subject to amendment, if any, that may be made to FR 22-B, with reference to G.O. Ms. No. 63305/Pay Cell/2020-1 dated 8.11.2020, the respondents are at liberty to revise the salary of the persons who are in service by refixing their scales of pay in the selection grade as also the pensionary benefits of the pensioners by refixing their scales of pay in selection grade in line with the amendments that may be made to FR 22-B for computing the admissible pension payable based on para 4 (i) of G.O. Ms. No.63305/Pay Cell/2010-1 dated 8.11.2010, which shall be applicable only prospectively and not retrospectively;

vii) Pursuant to the amendment, if any, made to FR 22-B, upon refixation of the scales of pay of the petitioners, and computing the revised pay that the petitioners who are in service would be entitled to and the revised monthly pension that the retired petitioners would be entitled to, it is made clear that the petitioners would also be en

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top