Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
R.Ilango – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges pay refixation and recovery orders. (Para 1) |
| 2. parties agree to prior batch directions. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. quotes directions prohibiting recovery, mandating fr 22-b amendment. (Para 4) |
| 4. disposes writ per prior order directions. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed against various orders passed by the respondent authorities re-fixing the pay of the petitioners and ordering for recovery of certain amounts pursuant to re-fixation of pay in terms of G.O.(Ms.)No.234, Finance (Pay and Cell) Department dated 01.06.2009 and G.O.(Ms.)No.23, Finance (Pay and Cell)
Department dated 12.01.2011.
2. Mr.P.S.Raman, learned Advocate General, assisted by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 6 fairly submitted that an identical issue has fallen for consideration before a Co-ordinate Bench of the Principal Seat of this Court in W.P.No.12275 of 2024 and batch and the said batch of writ petitions have been disposed of issuing various directions at paragraph No.85 of the said order, and as such this writ petition can also be disposed of on the same lines.
3. In response to the same, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
