SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 36062

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
D.Perumal – Appellant
Versus
The Director, O/o. Town and Country Planning – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.35916 of 2025



Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr. K.Viralinathan
For Respondents: Mr.S.S.Madhavan, Additional Government Pleader

Land reservation for development lapses if not acquired within 3 years under Section 38 of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged the reservation of land for a scheme road under the Detailed Development Plan No. 02, Map No. 3, published on 23.08.2005, invoking Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. The court found that no acquisition occurred within the stipulated three-year period from publication, leading to automatic lapse of reservation under Section 38(b). The court declared the land released from reservation. The key issue was whether the land reservation lapsed due to inaction on acquisition. The ratio decidendi hinges on Section 38(b), deeming land released if not acquired within three years of Gazette publication under Sections 26 or 27, absent agreement. The writ petition was allowed; reservation lapsed by operation of Section 38(b), entitling petitioner to absolute possession, with directions for revenue record corrections within four weeks.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks declaration of lapsed land reservation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. no acquisition within time triggers section 38 lapse. (Para 3 , 4)
3. reservation lapsed; possession and records corrected. (Para 5)

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P.(MD)No.35916 of 2025 D.Perumal .. Petitioner - Vs. -

1. The Director, O/o. Town and Country Planning, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Floor, C Market Road, Koyembedu, Chennai - 600 107.

2. The Joint Director / Member Secretary, Town and Country Planning, Trichy Region, No.11, Kajamalai Main Road, Thamarai Nagar, Kajamalai Colony, Trichy, Thiruchirapalli District. .. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Declaration, to declare the reservation made in respect of the petitioner land situated in Thiruchirappalli West, Thiruchirappalli City Corporation-Ko.Abhisekapuram Zone, Ward-1 New Pandamangalam, Block-06, Old.S.F.No.93/1B, T.S.No.5/2 to an extent of 1 Acre from Thiruchirapalli Local Planning Area Pandamangalam Detailed Development Plan No 02, Map. No. 3. DDP(TR)/DTCP /No.14/2005 dated 23.08.2005 has been lapsed in the light of Section 38 of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act 1971 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.

[Prayer amended as per order dated 07.04.2026 in WMP(MD)No.796 of 2026 by HCJ]

For Petitioner : Mr. K.Viralinathan For Respondents : Mr.S.S.Madhavan, Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for a declaration to declare that land in Thiruchirappalli West, Thiruchirappalli City Corporation- Ko.Abhisekapuram Zone, Ward-1, New Pandamangalam, Block-06, Old.S.F.No.93/1B, T.S.No.5/2 to an extent of 1 Acre from Thiruchirapalli Local Planning Area Pandamangalam in the detailed Development Plan No 02, Map No.3. DDP(TR)/DTCP /No.14/2005 dated 23.08.2005 has been lapsed in the light of Section 38 of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act 1971 . 2. The detailed development plan No.2 Map No.3 is deemed to have been released by operation of Section 38(b) of Tamilnadu Town and Country Plan Act, 1971. The second respondent published a detailed development plan dated 23.08.2005 in which the subject land was reserved was scheme road. Though the detailed development plan was published on 23.08.2005, the respondents had not taken any steps to acquire the land.

3. Section 38 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, details with plan and stipulates that if within three(3) years from the date of publication of the notice in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette under Section 26 or 27, no acquisition of land as provided in Sub-Section (2) of Section 37 is made in respect of any land reserved in a detailed development plan, or such land is not acquired by agreement, such land is deemed to be released from such reservation.

4. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents filed counter affidavit stating that the subject land has not been acquired within

5 years from the date of publication of the date of development plan.

5. In view of the above, operation of Section 38(b) of the Act, 1981, the reservation assigned to the subject land as scheme road is deemed to have lapsed. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed. It is declared that the reservation assigned to the subject scheme road is lapsed by operation of Section 38(b) of the Act and the petitioner is entitled to occupy the subject property absolutely in accordance with law. The revenue authorities are directed to make necessary corrections in the revenue records.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top