IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
M.Sankaran – Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director, Tirunelveli Town and Country Planning – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks removal of unauthorized construction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. no permission; regularization rejected; proceedings initiated. (Para 3) |
| 3. admitted unauthorized construction; proceedings under act. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. expedite ongoing removal; petition disposed. (Para 6) |
(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the unauthorized construction made by the fourth respondent.
2.The contention of the petitioner is that the fourth respondent is putting up a construction in the subject property without obtaining any permission from the local authorities. The representation submitted by the petitioner to take action as against such unauthorized construction, does not evoke any response. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
3.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the first respondent, by placing reliance on the counter affidavit filed by the first respondent, submitted that admittedly, the fourth respondent has not obtained any permission whatsoever from the local authorities. He further submitted that though an application for re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.