SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 36065

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
M.Sankaran – Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director, Tirunelveli Town and Country Planning – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.510 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.Selvan
For the Respondents: Mr.J.Ashok (R1), Additional Government Pleader, Mr.A.Sivanu Pandian (R2 & R3), Standing Counsel, Mr.S.Palani Velayutham (R4)

Court need not issue fresh mandamus if authorities have initiated removal proceedings for unauthorized construction under planning laws.

Headnote:The petitioner sought mandamus under Article 226 to direct authorities to remove unauthorized construction under Sections 56 and 57 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, as no permission was obtained and a prior representation yielded no response. Court found the construction unauthorized, with proceedings already initiated by authorities. No further directions needed beyond expediting ongoing action. Issue framed as whether mandamus required given admitted unauthorized construction and pending removal proceedings. Ratio: Competent authorities' action under the Act suffices; court directs completion within three months without additional orders. Writ petition disposed of with directions to complete removal proceedings within three months; no costs.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks removal of unauthorized construction. (Para 1 , 2)
2. no permission; regularization rejected; proceedings initiated. (Para 3)
3. admitted unauthorized construction; proceedings under act. (Para 4 , 5)
4. expedite ongoing removal; petition disposed. (Para 6)

(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the unauthorized construction made by the fourth respondent.

2.The contention of the petitioner is that the fourth respondent is putting up a construction in the subject property without obtaining any permission from the local authorities. The representation submitted by the petitioner to take action as against such unauthorized construction, does not evoke any response. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.

3.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the first respondent, by placing reliance on the counter affidavit filed by the first respondent, submitted that admittedly, the fourth respondent has not obtained any permission whatsoever from the local authorities. He further submitted that though an application for regularization was filed by the fourth respondent, the same was returned pointing out certain defects. However, the said application has neither been resubmitted nor has any fresh application been filed. Consequently, action has been initiated against the fourth respondent under Sections 56 and 57 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act for removal of the unauthorized construction, and such proceedings are presently in progress.

4.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed on record.

5.Perusal of the affidavit as well as the counter affidavit filed by the first respondent shows that the construction in question is admittedly an unauthorized construction. It is also evident that the competent authorities have already initiated appropriate proceedings under Sections 56 and 57 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 for removal of the said unauthorized construction.

6.In view of the above, no further direction is required to be issued by this Court. The authorities concerned are directed to proceed with the action already initiated, in accordance with law, for removal of the unauthorized construction and complete the entire exercise within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top