Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
M.Sundara Moorthy – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, The Commissioner Office, HR and CE Department, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks mandamus for poosari appointment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. hereditary poojariship claim rejected per precedent. (Para 3) |
| 3. liberty granted for custom-based application. (Para 4) |
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 07.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY M.Sundara Moorthy ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Commissioner, The Commissioner Office, HR and CE Department, Chennai.
2. The Joint Commissioner, Joint Commissioner Office, HR and CE Department, Madurai District.
3. The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Vishavanatha Swamy Thirukkovil, 1/c, Special Officer, Arulmigu Senthatti Ayanar Thirukovil, Keelanmarainadu Village, Sivakasi Taluk, Virudhunagar District. ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent herein to consider the petitioners representation dated 10.03.2026 and direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as the poosari of the Arulmigu Sri Chenthetti Ayyanar Temple, situated at Kovilur village, Vembakottai taluk, Virudhunagar district and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
