SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 36110

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Sounthar, J
Murugasamy – Appellant
Versus
Palanisamy – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.C.Umashankar
For the Respondents: Mr.R.Rajarajan

Table of Content
1. cross-objection challenges adverse observations in appellate judgment. (Para 1)
2. no appeal lies against court's passing observations. (Para 2)

ORDER

The cross objection is filed by the respondent challenging certain adverse observations made by the first appellate Court in paragraph 17 of its judgment.

2. It is settled law that no appeal or cross objection will lie against the passing observations of the Court. A perusal of Paragraph No.17 of the First Appellate Court judgement would establish, it made a passing observation that neither of the parties can claim title or possession over the suit property which is an irrigation pond. Since no appeal or cross objection will lie against the passing observation of the Court, the cross objection filed by the respondent is not maintainable and the same is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top