Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Sounthar, J
Murugasamy – Appellant
Versus
Palanisamy – Respondent
SA.No.210 of 2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. cross-objection challenges adverse observations in appellate judgment. (Para 1) |
| 2. no appeal lies against court's passing observations. (Para 2) |
ORDER
The cross objection is filed by the respondent challenging certain adverse observations made by the first appellate Court in paragraph 17 of its judgment.
2. It is settled law that no appeal or cross objection will lie against the passing observations of the Court. A perusal of Paragraph No.17 of the First Appellate Court judgement would establish, it made a passing observation that neither of the parties can claim title or possession over the suit property which is an irrigation pond. Since no appeal or cross objection will lie against the passing observation of the Court, the cross objection filed by the respondent is not maintainable and the same is dismissed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
