Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 36157
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. SARAVANAN, J
Ravi Kumar Papisetti – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Non-Corporate Circle - 17(1) – Respondent
WMP.Nos.10254 and 10257 of 2026
Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): Ms.Sakthi Pooja.P
For Respondent(s): Mr.A.P.Srinivas Senior Standing Counsel (Income Tax)
For the Petitioner(s): Ms.Sakthi Pooja.P
For Respondent(s): Mr.A.P.Srinivas Senior Standing Counsel (Income Tax)
Court permitted withdrawal of writ petition challenging income tax reassessment proceedings.
Headnote:The petitioner challenged multiple notices and orders issued under Sections 148A(b), 148A(d), 148, 147 read with 144, 156, 274 read with 271(1)(c), and 226(3) of the Income Tax Act pertaining to reassessment proceedings. Essential facts involved issuance of notices for reassessment, penalty, demand, recovery, and bank attachment. The court permitted withdrawal of the writ petition. No specific issues were framed as the matter was withdrawn. The court's reasoning was limited to acknowledging the endorsement for withdrawal. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition withdrawn and dismissed without costs. (Para 1 , 2) |
ORDER
The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle, which is extracted hereunder:-
“ The Counsel for Petitioner would like to withdraw the Writ Petition
2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
