Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
A.Antonyraj – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Principal Secretary School Education Department Secretariat, Chennai-9 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. admission stage disposal with consent. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. challenge to pay refixation orders. (Para 4) |
| 3. covered by prior order prohibiting recovery. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. disposed per earlier directions. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents 1 to 4 & 6 and Ms.S.Mahalakshmi, learned counsel, takes notice for the fifth respondent.
2. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 & 6 and learned counsel appearing for the fifth respondent.
4.This writ petition has been filed against the orders passed by the respondent authorities re-fixing the pay of the petitioner and ordering for recovery of certain amounts pursuant to re-fixation of pay in terms of the Government Orders in G.O.(Ms.) No.234, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 01.06.2009 and G.O.(Ms.) No.23, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 12.01.2011.
5. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration for admission, learned counsel on either side agree that the issue that arise
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
