SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 36178

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
G.Santhanalingam – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Principal Secretary School Education Department Secretariat, Chennai-9 – Respondent
W.M.P.(MD) No.7349 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.Aswin Raja Simman
For the Respondents: Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Addl. Government Pleader for R1 to R4 & R6, Ms.S.Mahalakshmi for R5

No recovery of excess pay from selection grade scales; refixation post FR 22-B amendment prospectively.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged an order refixing pay and ordering recovery under G.O.(Ms.) No.234, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 01.06.2009 and G.O.(Ms.) No.23, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 12.01.2011. The court found the issue covered by prior orders of a Coordinate Bench addressing identical pay fixation and recovery disputes. The court set aside recovery directions and directed no recovery from retiral or salary benefits. The court framed no new issues, relying on the ratio from W.P.No.12275 of 2024 batch, which prohibited recovery of excess payments in selection grade scales, mandated refixation post FR 22-B amendment, and allowed prospective pay revisions. Directions included no recovery from retirees' pensionary benefits or serving employees' salaries. The writ petition was disposed of in terms of the directions issued in the referenced order dated 02.03.2026.

Table of Content
1. admission stage disposal with consent. (Para 2 , 3)
2. challenge to pay refixation and recovery. (Para 4)
3. covered by prior order prohibiting recovery. (Para 5 , 6)
4. disposed per prior directions. (Para 7)

O R D E R

Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents 1 to 4 & 6 and Ms.S.Mahalakshmi, learned counsel, takes notice for the fifth respondent.

2. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 & 6 and learned counsel appearing for the fifth respondent.

4. This writ petition has been filed against the order passed by the respondent authority re-fixing the pay of the petitioner and ordering for recovery of certain amounts pursuant to re-fixation of pay in terms of the Government Orders in G.O.(Ms.) No.234, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 01.06.2009 and G.O.(Ms.) No.23, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated

12.01.2011.

5. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration for admission, learned counsel on either side agree that the issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is squarely covered by an order passed by the Coordinate Bench of the Principal Seat of this Court in W.P.No.12275 of 2024 and batch, dated 02.03.2026, in an identical fact situation and a copy of the said order is also placed before this Court. Further, In terms of the directions issued in the said order, this Court has also disposed of a batch of writ petitions vide order dated 26.03.2026 in W.P.(MD) No.30967 of 2025 and batch.

6. In the light of the above, this Court, after perusing the impugned orders passed by the respondent authorities, is of the considered view that this writ petition can be disposed of in the light of the directions issued in the said order dated 02.03.2026 in W.P.No.12275 of 2024 and batch. The directions issued at Paragraph No.85 of the said order read as under:

''i) The impugned order directing the fixation of the selection grade/special grade scale of pay at the first promotional level and 2nd promotional level is set aside to the extent that there shall be no recovery of amount, which has already been paid, from the petitioners;

ii) Insofar as the petitioners, who have retired from service is concerned, no amount shall be recovered on the basis of the impugned order from the retiral benefits/pensionary benefits of the petitioners with regard to the amount already paid;

iii) Insofar as the petitioners, who are still in service, no amount shall be recovered on the basis of the impugned order from the salary of the petitioners with regard to the amount already paid;

iv) In case any amount has already been recovered from any of the petitioners towards excess payment made in the selection grade scale, the same shall not be refunded to the petitioners and the respondents shall refix the selection grade scale of pay of the said petitioners after amendment to FR 22-B and, thereafter, upon computation, if any amount is due and payable to any of petitioners, the same shall be paid by the respondents forthwith;

v) Until FR 22-B is amended so as to include the directions given in G.O. Ms. No.63305/Pay Cell/2010-1 dated 8.11.2010, more particularly para 4 (i) of the said Government Order, no action shall be taken by the respondents to refix the scale of pay of the petitioners and similarly placed persons;

vi) Subject to amendment, if any, that may be made to FR 22-B, with reference to G.O. Ms. No.63305/Pay Cell/2020-1 dated 8.11.2020, the respondents are at liberty to revise the salary of the persons who are in service by refixing their scales of pay in the selection grade as also the pensionary benefits of the pensioners by refixing their scales of pay in selection grade in line with the amendments that may be made to FR 22-B for computing the admissible pension payable based on para 4 (i) of G.O. Ms

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top