IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
Tvl.G.Soundarapandian TALC Gurusamy Nadar Co., Rep. by its Partner S.Rajarethinam – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy State Tax Officer-1, Aranthangi Assessment Circle, Pudukkottai District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges ex parte gst order due to gstr discrepancies. (Para 2) |
| 2. no physical notice service caused non-response. (Para 3) |
| 3. grants conditional remand for fresh hearing. (Para 4) |
O R D E R
This Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 28.10.2025.
2. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and upon perusal of the impugned order, it is seen that there is discrepancy between GSTR-1, GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A, the petitioner did not avail the opportunity when the show cause notice and personal hearing notices were issued. Accordingly, the impugned order came to be passed ex parte.
3. It is the contention of the petitioner that since the show cause notice as well as the personal hearing notices were uploaded on the web portal and no physical service of the notices was effected, the petitioner failed to respond to the same and therefore, the impugned ex parte order came to be passed.
4. This Court, taking into account the said submission, is of the view that one more opportunity can be granted to the petitioner, however, on condition that the petitioner pays 25% of the disputed tax amount. This Writ Petition is allowed on the following terms:
i.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.