IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Tvl.THARANISRI TIMBERS – Appellant
Versus
The State Tax Officer, Sengottai Assessment Circle – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. mismatch in returns led to ex parte order. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner unaware of portal notices. (Para 3) |
| 3. granted fresh opportunity on 25% pre-deposit. (Para 4) |
O R D E R
This Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated
10.12.2025.
2. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and upon perusal of the impugned order, it is seen that when there was a mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-9, along with non-reversal of common credit attributable to exempt supplies, the petitioner did not avail the opportunity when the show cause notice and personal hearing notices were issued. Accordingly, the impugned order came to be passed ex parte.
3. It is the contention of the petitioner that since the show cause notice as well as the personal hearing notices were uploaded on the web portal and no physical service of the notices was effected, the petitioner was unaware of the same. The petitioner is a small trader with limited familiarity with the technical aspects of GST compliance and portal-based communication and had been depending upon a part-time accountant for filing returns and monitoring portal communications. Since the said accountant failed to inform t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.