IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Tvl.THARANISRI TIMBERS – Appellant
Versus
The State Tax Officer, Sengottai Assessment Circle – Respondent
W.M.P.(MD) No.7472 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. mismatch in returns led to ex parte order. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner unaware of portal notices. (Para 3) |
| 3. granted fresh opportunity on 25% pre-deposit. (Para 4) |
O R D E R
This Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated
10.12.2025.
2. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and upon perusal of the impugned order, it is seen that when there was a mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-9, along with non-reversal of common credit attributable to exempt supplies, the petitioner did not avail the opportunity when the show cause notice and personal hearing notices were issued. Accordingly, the impugned order came to be passed ex parte.
3. It is the contention of the petitioner that since the show cause notice as well as the personal hearing notices were uploaded on the web portal and no physical service of the notices was effected, the petitioner was unaware of the same. The petitioner is a small trader with limited familiarity with the technical aspects of GST compliance and portal-based communication and had been depending upon a part-time accountant for filing returns and monitoring portal communications. Since the said accountant failed to inform the petitioner about the notices and communications uploaded on the portal, the petitioner failed to respond to the same and therefore, the impugned ex parte order came to be passed.
4. This Court, taking into account the said submission, is of the view that one more opportunity can be granted to the petitioner, however, on condition that the petitioner pays 25% of the disputed tax amount. This Writ Petition is allowed on the following terms:
i. The petitioner shall pay 25% of the disputed tax amount within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a web copy of this order.
ii. Upon such payment, the impugned order dated 10.12.2025 shall stand set aside and the matter shall stand remitted back to the file of the respondent.
iii.The petitioner shall appear before the respondent without fail and file a reply and produce such documentary evidence in support of his claim.
iv. The respondent shall pass fresh orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.
v. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.