SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 36271

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. SARAVANAN, J
Golden Engineering Rep. by its partner, Srinivasan Lakshminarayanan – Appellant
Versus
Deputy State Tax Officer, Thirumudivakkam Assessment circle – Respondent
WMP.Nos.13159 and 13160 of 2026



Advocates:
For Petitioner(s): Mr.Parthiban V
For Respondent(s):Mrs.K.Vasanthamala Government Advocate

Writ petition challenging GST order remitted for de novo adjudication upon 10% pre-deposit due to expired appeal limitation.

Headnote:First Paragraph: The impugned order under Section 73 dated 06.12.2025 for financial year 2021-22 was issued following a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 21.07.2025, without petitioner responding or attending personal hearing, violating principles of natural justice. Court found limitation for appeal under Section 107 expired, but permitted pre-deposit of 10% disputed tax for fresh adjudication. Second Paragraph: Key issue framed as challenge to impugned order's legality due to lack of hearing despite notice. Ratio decidendi emphasizes remittal for de novo proceedings upon compliance with pre-deposit and reply, ensuring opportunity to substantiate case. Third Paragraph: Writ Petition disposed of; matter remitted to respondent for fresh order on merits within three months of compliance.

Table of Content
1. petition challenges gst order; appeal limitation expired. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. petitioner consents to 10% pre-deposit. (Para 5 , 6)
3. remitted for fresh order upon compliance; non-compliance allows recovery. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)

ORDER

Mrs. K.Vasanthamala, the learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the Respondent.

2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 06.12.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 21.07.2025 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. However, the Petitioner did not taken advantage of the same and has thus, suffered the impugned Order dated

06.12.2025

4. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired long before. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on

24.03.2026

5. At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 10% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication.

6. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle, which is extracted hereunder:-

“ The Petitioner is ready to predeposit 10% of disputed tax amount.

7. Recording the above consent, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 21.07.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

06.12.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 21.07.2025.

9. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated.

10. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

11. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

12. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

13. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top