Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Dhandapani, J
K.R.Mani – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Tamilnadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to impugned quarry order; lease details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. notices for mineral costs; pending writ ignored. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. fair concession for remand; materials reviewed. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. order set aside; remanded for excess inquiry. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER
This petition has been filed challenging the impugned order of the third respondent dated 14.09.2024 and seeking to quash the same.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, by exercising powers underRule 19Aof theTamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959, the Government of Tamil Nadu, vide G.O. (3D) No.73 Industries (MME- II) Department dated 03.09.2007, granted a quarry lease in favour of the petitioner for quarrying black granite from the patta lands over an extent of 1.50.0 Hectares in S.F.Nos.1085/1 (Part), 1085/4 (Part), 1085/5 and 1085/6 (Part) in Mallankuzhi Village, (formerly Sathyamangalam Taluk), now Talavadi Taluk, Erode District for a period of 20 years subject to the conditions mentioned therein. Pursuant thereto, a lease agreement was executed on 01.10.2007 for a period of 20 years commencing from 01.07.2007 and ending on 30.09.2027. For existing leases, the Government ame
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
