SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 36295

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
L.Kuppuswamy – Appellant
Versus
The Arbitrator cum District Collector – Respondent
WMP.No.34154 of 2022



Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr.R.Ramesh Raja
For Respondents: Mr.R.Subramaniam ACGSC (R1), Ms.S.Indhu Bala (R2), Additional Government Pleader Mr.Su.Srinivasan (R3), Standing Counsel Mr.Sagar Verma (R4)

Mandamus issued to consider representation for well compensation in land acquisition award within stipulated time.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged land acquisition for a national highway project under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Sections 26-30) and National Highways Act, 1956 (Section 3G). An award was passed for the land but omitted compensation for a well on the property, leading to representations seeking rectification. The court found the representations pending and directed consideration. The key issue was the failure to address compensation for structures like wells in the acquisition award. The ratio decidendi emphasizes that authorities must comprehensively assess all affected property components, providing hearing opportunities before finalizing awards, in line with statutory mandates for fair compensation. The writ petition was disposed of with directions to the arbitrator to consider the representation dated 20.12.2022 within four weeks, affording hearing; liberty granted to seek compensation enhancement for land.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks direction for disposing land acquisition representations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents cite passed award; suggest compensation enhancement application. (Para 3)
3. court directs consideration of representation with hearing within four weeks. (Para 5 , 6)

..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 10.6.2022, and 20.12.2022 in the light of the law settled by the Honble High Court in various judgements by strictly complying statutory provision Section 26 to 30 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and National High ways Act 1956 Section 3 (G) 7 within a time to be stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner: Mr.R.Ramesh Raja For Respondents: Mr.R.Subramaniam ACGSC (R1)

Ms.S.Indhu Bala (R2)

Additional Government Pleader Mr.Su.Srinivasan (R3)

Standing Counsel Mr.Sagar Verma (R4)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 10.6.2022, and 20.12.2022 in the light of the law settled by the High Court in various judgements by strictly complying the statutory provision Section 26 to 30 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and National High ways Act 1956 Section 3 (G) 7 within a time to be stipulated by this Court.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the 1st respondent had passed an Award on 02.06.2022, with respect to the acquisition of petitioner’s land alone. As the 1st respondent has not passed any Award with respect to the well situated in the petitioner’s land, the petitioner submitted a representations dated 10.06.2022 to the respondents on 20.12.2022 to appoint an engineer and fix appropriate compensation for the petitioner’s well. As the same was not considered till date, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking for the aforesaid relief.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the Award was passed on 02.06.2022, with respect to acquired land of the petitioner and if the petitioner is aggrieved over the same, he can file appropriate application for enhancement of compensation, in the manner known to law.

4. Heard both sides. Perused the records.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 20.12.2022, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the persons concerned. It is made clear that since the Award with respect to the acquired land of the petitioner was already passed on 02.06.2022, the petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate application seeking enhancement of compensation, if he is so aggrieved.

6. This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top